Semen parameters and sperm DNA damage and its impact on birth

Authors

  • Rana Mumtaz Matlob Department of Anatomy, Histology and Clinical Embryology, College of Medicine, University of Duhok, Kurdistan region/Iraq
  • Iman Yousif Abdulmalik Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Duhok, Kurdistan region/Iraq
  • Yasin Kareem Amin Department of Anatomy, Histology and Clinical Embryology, College of Medicine, University of Duhok, Kurdistan region/Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10431232

Keywords:

recurrent pregnancy loss, comet assay, sperm DNA damage, semen analysis

Abstract

This case-control study, conducted from July 2021 to August 2022 in Duhok, Kurdistan Region, Iraq, investigates the semen parameters and sperm DNA damage in male partners of couples experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) compared to fertile couples without pregnancy loss. The study, with participants gathered from various gynaecological clinics, sheds light on the implications for mammalian reproductive health and wildlife conservation such as captive breeding programs. Semen indices, analyzed according to World Health Organization (WHO) standards, revealed that couples with RPL exhibited significantly lower rates of progressive motility (45.62 ± 16.01 vs. 53.08 ± 10.11, P=0.037) and normal morphology (2.88 ± 1.5 vs. 3.48 ± 1.2, P=0.048) compared to the control group. Furthermore, the study employed the alkaline comet assay to assess the magnitude of sperm DNA damage. Results indicated a significantly higher degree of sperm DNA damage in couples with RPL (21.99 ± 1.13 vs. 17.42 ± 1.39, P=0.018), along with a notable increase in DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI) (43.46 ± 20.39 vs. 29.83 ± 16.25, P=0.0048) compared to the control group. These findings not only contribute to our understanding of human reproductive health but also have broader implications for mammalian fertility, potentially influencing wildlife populations. Further research is warranted to unravel the underlying mechanisms and explore interventions for couples experiencing RPL, with potential applications in mammalian and wildlife conservation. The semen of male partners of couples with RPL have lower progressive motility and a higher percentage of abnormal morphology with a significantly higher degree of DNA damage when compared with their age-matched control group, therefor sperm DNA damage may be included as an important step in the evaluation of couples with RPL. 

References

Absalan, F., Ghannadi, A., Kazerooni, M., Parifar, R., Jamalzadeh, F., & Amiri, S. (2012). Value of sperm chromatin dispersion test in couples with unexplained recurrent abortion. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 29, 11-14.

Agarwal, A., Majzoub, A., Esteves, S. C., Ko, E., Ramasamy, R., & Zini, A. (2016). Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios. Translational andrology and urology, 5(6), 935.

Aitken, R. J. (2017). DNA damage in human spermatozoa; important contributor to mutagenesis in the offspring. Translational andrology and urology, 6(Suppl 4), S761.

Alahmar, A. T., Singh, R., & Palani, A. (2022). Sperm DNA fragmentation in reproductive medicine: A review. Journal of human reproductive sciences, 15(3), 206.

Benagiano, G., Paoli, D., Lombardo, F., Brosens, J. J., & Brosens, I. A. (2017). DNA fragmentation and the ultimate success of a pregnancy. Translational andrology and urology, 6(Suppl 4), S539.

Bhattacharya, S. M. (2008). Association of various sperm parameters with unexplained repeated early pregnancy loss—which is most important?. International urology and nephrology, 40, 391-395.

Caglar, G. S., Köster, F., Schöpper, B., Asimakopoulos, B., Nehls, B., Nikolettos, N., ... & Al-Hasani, S. (2007). Semen DNA fragmentation index, evaluated with both TUNEL and Comet assay, and the ICSI outcome. In vivo, 21(6), 1075-1080.

Cao, X., Cui, Y., Zhang, X., Lou, J., Zhou, J., & Wei, R. (2017). The correlation of sperm morphology with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget, 8(33), 55646.

Carlini, T., Paoli, D., Pelloni, M., Faja, F., Dal Lago, A., Lombardo, F., ... & Gandini, L. (2017). Sperm DNA fragmentation in Italian couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. Reproductive biomedicine online, 34(1), 58-65.

Chi, H. J., Chung, D. Y., Choi, S. Y., Kim, J. H., Kim, G. Y., Lee, J. S., ... & Roh, S. I. (2011). Integrity of human sperm DNA assessed by the neutral comet assay and its relationship to semen parameters and clinical outcomes for the IVF-ET program. Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine, 38(1), 10.

Cho, C. L., & Agarwal, A. (2018). Role of sperm DNA fragmentation in male factor infertility: A systematic review. Arab journal of urology, 16(1), 21-34.

Collins, A. R. (2004). The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Molecular biotechnology, 26(3), 249-261.

Dai, Y., Liu, J., Yuan, E., Li, Y., Shi, Y., & Zhang, L. (2022). Relationship among traditional semen parameters, sperm DNA fragmentation, and unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 12, 802632.

Dai, Y., Liu, J., Yuan, E., Li, Y., Shi, Y., & Zhang, L. (2022). Relationship among traditional semen parameters, sperm DNA fragmentation, and unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 12, 802632.

Donnelly, E. T., Steele, E. K., McClure, N., & Lewis, S. E. (2001). Assessment of DNA integrity and morphology of ejaculated spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men before and after cryopreservation. Human reproduction, 16(6), 1191-1199.

Duty, S. M., Singh, N. P., Ryan, L., Chen, Z., Lewis, C., Huang, T., & Hauser, R. (2002). Reliability of the comet assay in cryopreserved human sperm. Human Reproduction, 17(5), 1274-1280.

Edition, F. (2010). Examination and processing of human semen. Geneva: World Health.

Eisenberg, M. L., Sapra, K. J., Kim, S. D., Chen, Z., & Louis, G. M. B. (2017). Semen quality and pregnancy loss in a contemporary cohort of couples recruited before conception: data from the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment (LIFE) Study. Fertility and sterility, 108(4), 613-619.

Esquerré-Lamare, C., Walschaerts, M., Chansel Debordeaux, L., Moreau, J., Bretelle, F., Isus, F., ... & Bujan, L. (2018). Sperm aneuploidy and DNA fragmentation in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: a multicenter case-control study. Basic and clinical andrology, 28(1), 1-10.

Ferrigno, A., Ruvolo, G., Capra, G., Serra, N., & Bosco, L. (2021). Correlation between the DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and sperm morphology of infertile patients. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 38, 979-986.

Harlev, A. (2017). Infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss and sperm DNA fragmentation, have we found the missing link?. Translational Andrology and Urology, 6(Suppl 4), S704.

Ibrahim, Y., & Johnstone, E. (2018). The male contribution to recurrent pregnancy loss. Translational andrology and urology, 7(Suppl 3), S317.

Kalthur, G., Adiga, S. K., Upadhya, D., Rao, S., & Kumar, P. (2008). Effect of cryopreservation on sperm DNA integrity in patients with teratospermia. Fertility and Sterility, 89(6), 1723-1727.

Kamkar, N., Ramezanali, F., & Sabbaghian, M. (2018). The relationship between sperm DNA fragmentation, free radicals and antioxidant capacity with idiopathic repeated pregnancy loss. Reproductive biology, 18(4), 330-335.

Khadem, N., Poorhoseyni, A., Jalali, M., Akbary, A., & Heydari, S. T. (2014). Sperm DNA fragmentation in couples with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortions. Andrologia, 46(2), 126-130.

Kolte, A. M., Bernardi, L. A., Christiansen, O. B., Quenby, S., Farquharson, R. G., Goddijn, M., & Stephenson, M. D. (2015). Terminology for pregnancy loss prior to viability: a consensus statement from the ESHRE early pregnancy special interest group. Human reproduction, 30(3), 495-498.

Lewis, S. E., Aitken, R. J., Conner, S. J., De Iuliis, G., Evenson, D. P., Henkel, R., ... & Gharagozloo, P. (2013). The impact of sperm DNA damage in assisted conception and beyond: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. Reproductive biomedicine online, 27(4), 325-337.

Mohamed, O. A., Khera, M., Alukal, J., Youssef, G., Francis, M., & Hamed, H. A. (2007). Correlation between sperm DNA fragmentation and morphology and recurrent spontaneous abortions. Fertility and sterility, 88, S76.

Morris, I. D., Ilott, S., Dixon, L., & Brison, D. R. (2002). The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development. Human reproduction, 17(4), 990-998.

Niederberger, C. (2016). Re: relationship between sperm aneuploidy, sperm DNA integrity, chromatin packaging, traditional semen parameters, and recurrent pregnancy loss. Journal of Urology, 196(4), 1232.

Oleszczuk, K., Augustinsson, L., Bayat, N., Giwercman, A., & Bungum, M. (2013). Prevalence of high DNA fragmentation index in male partners of unexplained infertile couples. Andrology, 1(3), 357-360.

Ribas-Maynou, J., García-Peiró, A., Fernandez-Encinas, A., Amengual, M. J., Prada, E., Cortes, P., ... & Benet, J. (2012). Double stranded sperm DNA breaks, measured by Comet assay, are associated with unexplained recurrent miscarriage in couples without a female factor.

Robinson, L., Gallos, I. D., Conner, S. J., Rajkhowa, M., Miller, D., Lewis, S., ... & Coomarasamy, A. (2012). The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human reproduction, 27(10), 2908-2917.

Schulte, R. T., Ohl, D. A., Sigman, M., & Smith, G. D. (2010). Sperm DNA damage in male infertility: etiologies, assays, and outcomes. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 27, 3-12.

Simon, L., Lutton, D., McManus, J., & Lewis, S. E. (2011). Sperm DNA damage measured by the alkaline Comet assay as an independent predictor of male infertility and in vitro fertilization success. Fertility and sterility, 95(2), 652-657.

Simon, L., Lutton, D., McManus, J., & Lewis, S. E. (2011). Sperm DNA damage measured by the alkaline Comet assay as an independent predictor of male infertility and in vitro fertilization success. Fertility and sterility, 95(2), 652-657.

Sivanarayana, T., Ravi Krishna, C., Jaya Prakash, G., Krishna, K. M., Madan, K., Sudhakar, G., & Rama Raju, G. A. (2014). Sperm DNA fragmentation assay by sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD): correlation between DNA fragmentation and outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Reproductive medicine and biology, 13, 87-94.

Tan, J., Taskin, O., Albert, A., & Bedaiwy, M. A. (2019). Association between sperm DNA fragmentation and idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive biomedicine online, 38(6), 951-960.

Xie, D. E., Lu, C., Zhu, Y., Zhu, S., Yang, E. J., & Jin, X. (2018). Analysis on the association between sperm DNA fragmentation index and conventional semen parameters, blood microelements and seminal plasma ROS in male patients with infertility. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 15(6), 5173-5176.

Zhang, L., Wang, L., Zhang, X., Xu, G., Zhang, W., Wang, K., ... & Gai, L. (2012). Sperm chromatin integrity may predict future fertility for unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion patients. International journal of andrology, 35(5), 752-757.

Zhang, L., Wang, L., Zhang, X., Xu, G., Zhang, W., Wang, K., ... & Gai, L. (2012). Sperm chromatin integrity may predict future fertility for unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion patients. International journal of andrology, 35(5), 752-757.

Zhao, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2014). Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and sterility, 102(4), 998-1005.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-28

How to Cite

Matlob, R. M. ., Abdulmalik, I. Y. ., & Amin, Y. K. . (2023). Semen parameters and sperm DNA damage and its impact on birth. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity, 7(Special Issue), 819–829. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10431232