Nuchal scalation patterns in Iranian Mugger crocodiles (Crocodylus palustris Lesson, 1831) point to an overlooked conservation unit
Keywords:
Conservation unit, Identification guide, Morphological diversity, Mugger crocodiles, Nuchal scutesAbstract
Nuchal scutes patterns in crocodilians are important for distinguishing species and populations, particularly isolated ones. The study focuses on nuchal scutes numbers and patterns of Mugger Crocodile (Crocodylus palustris (Lesson, 1831)) across its distribution in Iran, India, and Sri Lanka. Data was collected from 146 crocodile photos, analyzing both the numbers and pattern of nuchal scutes. Nonparametric methods were employed due to non-normal data distribution. The Binomial Test indicated no bias from the six-scute pattern, with 50% of Iranian crocodiles having variations from six scutes. Confidence intervals for scutes patterns were 0.41-0.59 in Iran and 0.01-0.13 in India and Sri Lankan crocodiles conformed to the six-scutes pattern. A total of 18 different scute patterns were identified, with unique patterns observed in Iranian crocodiles. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences in scute patterns across all data and specifically in Iran. The Mann-Whitney U test indicated differences between the typical scute pattern and others, except for a few specific patterns. Iran exhibited the highest variation in nuchal scute patterns, with diversity increasing towards the north and west. Iranian mugger crocodile populations face threats from flooding, drought, and climate change, necessitating further studies for conservation planning. Also, there is concern about potential genetic bottlenecks due to isolation, highlighting the need for genetic investigation and its possible relationship with morphological diversity.
References
Aggarwal, R. K., Lalremruata, A., & Dubey, B. (2015). Development of fourteen novel microsatellite markers of Crocodylus palustris, the Indian mugger, and their cross-species transferability in ten other crocodilians. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 7, 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-014-0331-4
Anderson, S. C. (1979). Synopsis of the turtles, crocodiles, and amphisbaenians of Iran. PROC. CALIFORNIA ACAD. SCI. 41, 501–528
Balaguera-Reina, S. A., Venegas-Anaya, M., Rivera-Rivera, B., & Densmore, L. D. (2017). Scute Patterns as an Individual Identification Tool in an American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) Population on Coiba Island, Panama. J. Herpetol. 51, 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1670/17-023
Boulenger, G.-A., & Blanford, W. T. (1890). The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. London: Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.100797
Campos, J. C., Mobaraki, A., Abtin, E., Godinho, R., & Brito, J. C. (2018). Preliminary assessment of genetic diversity and population connectivity of the Mugger Crocodile in Iran. Amphibia-Reptilia 39, 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-16000173
Choudhury, B. C., & De Silva, A. (2013). Crocodylus palustris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e. T5667A3046723.
Deraniyagala, P. E. P. (1939). The Tetrapod Reptiles of Ceylon; Testudinates and Crocodilians–Vol. 1. Natl. Museums Sri Lanka, Colombo.
Deraniyagala, P. E. P. (1953). A Colored Atlas of Some Vertebrates from Ceylon: Volume Two (vol. 2) Tetrapod Reptilia. Sri Lanka: Colombo National Museum.
Desai, B., Patel, A., Patel, V., Shah, S., Raval, M. S., & Ghosal, R. (2022). Identification of free-ranging mugger crocodiles by applying deep learning methods on UAV imagery. Ecol. Inform. 72, 101874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101874
Forero Sr, M. G., Lozano, J. J., & Balaguera-Reina, S. A. (2019). Individual identification automation in Crocodylians through imagery processing: American Crocodile as a study case. in Applications of Digital Image Processing XLII (SPIE), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2528773
García-Grajales, J., Buenrostro Silva, A., & Téllez-Rodríguez, P. R. (2009). Variación de patrón de escutelación nucal del cocodrilo americano (Crocodylus acutus Cuvier 1807) en La Ventanilla, Oaxaca, México. Acta zoológica Mex. 25, 375–382.
Ghamemi RaeiniNejad, M., & Sadeghi, H. (2017). The evaluation of carbon sequestration at plant’s organs and soil characteristics in understory of Zygophyllum atriplicoides and Gymnocarpus decander (Case study: Saleh-Abad, Hormozgan). Iran. J. Range Desert Res. 24, 699–707. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrdr.2017.114053
Goumas, M., Lee, V. E., Boogert, N. J., Kelley, L. A., & Thornton, A. (2020). The role of animal cognition in human-wildlife interactions. Front. Psychol. 11, 589978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589978
Hertel, A. G., Royauté, R., Zedrosser, A., & Mueller, T. (2021). Biologging reveals individual variation in behavioural predictability in the wild. J. Anim. Ecol. 90, 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13406
Lesson, R. P. (1831). Catalogue des Reptiles qui font partie d’une Collection zoologique recueille dans l’Inde continentale ou en Afrique, et apportée en France par M. Lamare-Piquot. Bull. des Sci. Nat. Géologie, Paris 25, 119–123.
Minton, S. (1966). A contribution to the herpetology of West Pakistan. Bull. AMNH New York 134, 1–192.
Mobaraki, A., & Abtin, E. (2013). Estimate of Mugger population in Iran. Crocodile Spec. Gr. Newsl. 32, 21–22. Available at: http://www.iucncsg.org/365_docs/attachments/protarea/32(1-82bd5880.pdf
Mobaraki, A., Erfani, M., Abtin, E., Brito, J. C., Tan, W. C., Ziegler, T., et al. (2023). Last chance to see? Iran and India as strongholds for the Mugger Crocodile. 59, 1–9.
Mobaraki, A., McCaskill, L., Schepp, U., Abtin, E., Masroor, R., Pandhi, D., et al. (2021). Conservation status of the mugger ( Crocodylus palustris ): Establishing a task force for a poster species of climate change. Conserv. status mugger ( Crocodylus palustris ) Establ. a task force a poster species of Clim. Chang. 40, 12–20.
Mobaraki, A., Silva, M. R., & Abtin, E. (2015). Sustainable Management and conservation of the Mugger Crocodile (Crocodylus palustris) in Iran. Baeza Int. Univ. Andalusia, Baeza.
Petso, T., Jamisola Jr, R. S., Mpoeleng, D., Bennitt, E., & Mmereki, W. (2021). Automatic animal identification from drone camera based on point pattern analysis of herd behaviour. Ecol. Inform. 66, 101485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101485
Platt, S. G., Thorbjarnarson, J. B., & Rainwater, T. R. (2010). Scalation of the American crocodile, Crocodylus acutus (Crocodylidae, Crocodilia), from the coastal zone of northern Belize. Caribb. J. Sci. 46, 332–338. https://doi.org/10.18475/cjos.v46i2.a23
Seijas, E. A. (2002). Scale patterns of American crocodiles (Crocodylus acutus) from several Venezuelan localities. Rev. Unellez Cienc. y Tecnol. 20, 118–134.
Treeprapin, K., Kaewtip, K., Singchat, W., Ariyaraphong, N., Panthum, T., Duengkae, P., et al. (2024). Transforming crocodile traceability: Deep metric learning for identifying Siamese crocodiles. Ecol. Inform., 102771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102771
Velasco, A., & De Sola, R. (2022). Variations in the pattern of post occipital and nuchal scales in crocodylus intermedius (orinoco crocodile) variaciones en el patrón de las escamas postoccipital y nucal en crocodylus intermedius (caimán del orinoco). Com. Editor., 20.
Velasco Barbieri, A. (2020). Individual identification ofCrocodylus intermedius (Orinoco crocodile) using tail spot patterns. Cuad. Investig. UNED 12, 507–514. https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v12i2.3140
Voluntary Nature Conservancy (2020). 7th Charotar Crocodile Count- 2020, Voluntary Nature Conservancy. Gujarat, India.
Vyas, R. (2018). Results of the 2015 mugger crocodile (Crocodylus palustris) count at Vadodara, Gujarat, India. Reptil. Amphib. 25, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.17161/randa.v25i1.14221
Wermuth, H., & Fuchs, K. (1978). Bestimmen von Krokodilen und ihrer Häute: e. Anleitung zum Identifizieren d. Art-u. Rassen-Zugehörigkeit d. Krokodile für Behörden (im Zusammenhang mit d. Artenschutz-Übereinkommen von Washington), für Reptilleder-Industrie u. Reptilien-Handel, für Reptil. Stuttgart: Fischer.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.