Daily activity pattern of Malayan Sun bear in Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram, India


  • Sushanto Gouda Amity Institute of Forestry and Wildlife, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Netrapal Singh Chauhan Amity Institute of Forestry and Wildlife, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Janmejay Sethy Amity Institute of Forestry and Wildlife, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Hemanta Sahu North Orissa University, Takatpur, Baripada, Mayurbhanj, Odisha, India




Foraging, camera trapping, trap index, degraded forest


Sun bear (Helarctos malayanus) is the smallest bear species and remains the least known bear among the ursids. Reliable information on population and activity pattern of Sun bear has been lacking, thereby creating difficulties for field managers and conservationists to develop a management plan for their conservation. The study was an attempt to determine the habitat preference and daily activity of Sun bear through camera trapping and other signs survey methods. In the study, we had a combined trapping effort of 647 trap-nights with a total of 18 independent images of Sun bear recorded between May 2014 and March 2016. Distribution of bear signs per hectare was found to be highest in the Bamboo forest (0.398), owing to large numbers of termite's mounds. The photo capture rate of Sun bear in Dampa Tiger Reserve was found to vary by different habitats with high numbers in degraded forest landscape within the Reserve. The variation was also influenced by the disturbance of humans in the area and other feeding opportunities. The relative abundance index shows that Old Chikha has the highest index of 1.89 with a mean value of 5.26 ±0.670 among all blocks in Dampa Tiger Reserve. The daily activity index suggests that Malayan Sun bears are more active during the crepuscular period than diurnal. The highest activity was recorded between 1800- 2200 with 14.89% detection probability. No activity was recorded during the mid-noon phase. Primary forests and degraded forests with their large fruiting trees were represented as important habitat owing to the availability of fruits, termites, and invertebrates. The study will hopefully be an important step towards acquiring more knowledge on the ecology of the species and provide valuable information for the conservation of the species and their habitat.


Augeri D.M. 2005. On the Biogeographic Ecology of the Malayan Sun bear. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Biological science, University of Cambridge.

Bailey L.L., Simons T.R., Pollock K.H. 2004. Estimating site occupancy and species detection probability parameters for terrestrial salamanders. Ecological Applications 14(3): 692–702.

Bowkett A.E., Rovero F., Marshall A.R. 2007. The use of camera trap data to model habitat use by antelope species in the Udzungwa Mountain forests, Tanzania. African Journal of Ecology 46(4): 479–487.

Datta A., Naniwadekar R., Anand M.O. 2008. Occurrence and conservation status of small carnivores in two protected areas in Arunachal Pradesh, North-east India. Small Carnivorous Conservation 39:1–10.

Devi H.S., Hmingthangpuii K.K., Sarma K.K. 2011. Change in vegetation cover of Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram, North East India: A Serious threat to Tiger population. Journal of Experimental Sciences 2(9): 01-06.

Fredriksson G., Steinmetz R., Wong S., Garshelis D.L. 2008. Helarctos malayanus. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.1. The IUCN Red list of Endangered Species.

Fredriksson G.M., Wich S.A., Trisno. 2006. Frugivory in Sun bears (Helarctos malayanus) is linked to El Nin˜ o-related fluctuations in fruiting phenology, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 89: 489–508.

Griffiths M., Van Schaik C. 1993. The impact of human traffic on the abundance and activity periods of Sumatran rain forest wildlife. Conservation Biology 7: 623–626.

Islam M.A., Uddin M., Aziz M.A., Muzaffar S.B., Chakma S., Chowdhury S.U. et al. 2013. Status of bears in Bangladesh: going, going, gone?.Ursus 24(1):83-90.

Jackson R.M., Roe J.D., Wangchuk R., Hunter D.O. 2006. Estimating Snow leopard population abundance using photography and capture–recapture techniques. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34(3): 772–781.

Jenks K.E., Chanteap P., Damrongchainarong K., Cutter P., Redford T., Lynam T., Howard J., Leimgruber P. 2011. Using relative abundance indices from camera-trapping to test wildlife conservation hypotheses- An example from Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Tropical Conservation Science 4(2):113–131.

Jorge M.C.L., Ciocheti G., Pivello V.R. 2008. Carnivore mammals in a fragmented landscape in northeast of São Paulo State, Brazil. Biodiversity Conservation 17(7):1573-1580.

Karanth K.U., Nichols J.D. 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79(8): 2852–2862.

Kawanishi K., Sunquist M.E. 2004. Conservation status of tigers in a primary rainforest of Peninsular Malaysia. Biological Conservation 120: 329–344.

Kelly J.M. 2008. Design, evaluate, refine: Camera trap studies for elusive species. Animal Conservation 11(3): 182–184.

Lalrinchhana C., Solanki G.S. 2015. Lizard (Reptilia: Sauria) diversity of Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram, India. Science Vision 15(1):19-28.

Li S., Mcshea W.J., Wang D., Shao L., Shi X. 2010. The use of infrared-triggered cameras for surveying phasianids in Sichuan Province, China. Ibis 152(2): 299-309.

Linkie M., Dinata Y., Nugroho A., Haidir I.A. 2007. Estimating occupancy of a data deficient mammalian species living in tropical rainforests: Sun bears in the Kerinci Seblat region, Sumatra. Biological Conservation 137: 20–27.

Meijaard E. 1999. Ursus Helarctos malayanus, the neglected Malayan Sun bear. Netherland Commission for International Nature Protection, Mededelingen No. 34.

Ngoprasert D., Reed D.H., Steinmetz R., Gale G.A. 2012. Density estimation of Asian bears using photographic capture–recapture sampling based on chest marks. Ursus 23(2):117–133.

Nomura F., Higashi S., Ambu L., Mohamed M. 2004. Notes on oil palm plantation use and seasonal spatial relationships of Sun bears in Sabah Malaysia. Ursus 15: 227–231.

O'Brein T.G., Kinnaird M.F., Wibisono H.T. 2003. Crouching tigers hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey population in a tropical forest landscape. Animal Conservation 6: 131-139.

Pawar S., Birand A. 2001. A Survey of amphibians, reptiles and birds in North-east, India. CERC Technical Report 6, Centre for Ecological Research and Conservation, Mysore.

Rovero F., Marshall A.R. 2009. Camera trapping photographic rate as an index of density in forest ungulates. Journal of Applied Ecology 46(5): 1011–1017.

Rowcliffe J.M., Carbone C. 2008. Surveys using camera traps: Are we looking to a brighter future? Animal Conservation 11(3): 185–186.

Rowcliffe J.M., Field J., Turvey S.T., Carbone C. 2008. Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition. Journal of Applied Ecology45: 1228–1236.

Scotson L., Fredriksson G., Auguri D., Cheah C., Ngoprasert D., Wai-Ming W. 2017. Helarctos malayanus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: eT9760A45033547.

Servheen C. 1999. Sun bear Conservation Action Plan. In: Bears: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. Eds. Christopher Servheen Herrero and Bernard Peyton. IUCN/SSC Bear Specialist Group. Epublishing Inc., USA, pp. 219-224.

Sethy J., Chauhan N.P.S.2012. Conservation status of Sun bear (Helarctos malayanus) in Nagaland State, North-East India. AsianJournal of Conservation Biology1(2): 103-109.

Smith, A.T, and Y. Xie. 2008. A Guide to the Mammals of China. Princeton: Princeton University Press, China, 423-425.

Stanley T.R., Royle J.A. 2005. Estimating site occupancy and abundance using indirect detection indices. Journal of Wildlife Management 69: 874–883.

Steinmetz R., Garshelis D.L. 2008. Distinguishing Asiatic Black Bears and Sun bears by Claw Marks on Climbed Trees. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72(3): 814-821.

Steinmetz R.G., Garshelis D.L., Chuptipong W., Seuaturien N. 2013. Foraging ecology and coexistence of Asiatic black bears and Sun bears in a seasonal tropical forest in Southeast Asia. Journal of Mammalogy 94(1):1-18.

Stephens P.A., Zaumyslova O.Y., Miquelle D.G., Myslenkov A.E., Hayward D. 2006. Estimating population density from indirect sign: Track counts and the Formozov–Malyashev–Pereleshin formula. Animal Conservation 9: 339–348.

Tobler M.W., Carrillo-Percastegui S.E., Leite Pitman R., Mares R., Powell G. 2008. An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large and medium sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Animal Conservation 11: 169–178.

Wong S.T. 2002. The ecology of Malayan Sun bears (Helarctos malayanus) in lowland tropical rainforest of Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. M.Sc. Thesis, Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.

Wong S.T., Servheen C.W., Ambu L. 2004.home range, movement and activity patterns, and bedding sites of Malayan Sun bears Helarctos malayanus in the Rainforest of Borneo. Biological Conservation 119: 169–181.

Wong W.M., Leader-Williams N., Linkie M. 2013. Quantifying changes in Sun bear distribution and their forest habitat in Sumatra. Animal Conservation 16: 216–223.




How to Cite

Gouda, S., Chauhan, N. S., Sethy, . J., & Sahu, H. (2020). Daily activity pattern of Malayan Sun bear in Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram, India. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity, 4(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.22120/jwb.2020.117400.1103