The role of forensic DNA experts and Artificial Intelligence in enhancing the effectiveness of wildlife crime investigations in Cyprus

Ahmed Ali; Salam  Hassan; Kawar Mohammed Mousa

Authors

Ahmed Ali Department of Public law, Near East University, Nicosia 99138, North Cyprus, via Mersin 10, Turkey https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4852-1665
Salam Hassan Department of Public law, Near East University, Nicosia 99138, North Cyprus, via Mersin 10, Turkey
Kawar Mohammed Mousa Department of Business Administration, Near East University, Nicosia 99138, North Cyprus, via Mersin 10, Turkey

Keywords:

Wildlife Crime, Law Enforcement, Forensic, AI

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of wildlife crimes globally and in Cyprus presents an urgent need for more effective investigation methods. This study explores the factors that influence the effectiveness of wildlife crime investigations, focusing on the role of forensic DNA experts, different forensic methods, inter-agency relationships, and the incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based tools. Employing a quantitative approach and a sample of 560 respondents, the study finds that all the posited variables involvement of forensic DNA experts, types of forensic methods used, organizational and operational relationships, and AI-based forensic tools significantly influence the outcome of investigations. Forensic DNA experts and AI-based forensic tools are key contributors to investigation success. These findings show that forensic DNA experts (β = 0.60), modern forensic methods (β = 0.30), inter-agency relationships (β = 0.20), and AI-based tools (β = 0.40) significantly enhance wildlife crime investigations, highlighting the need for specialized training, advanced forensic techniques, and AI integration. The study fills an existing gap in research by focusing on Cyprus, an area underrepresented in previous studies. It also introduces AI-based tools such as machine learning algorithms for pattern recognition, automated DNA analysis, facial and species recognition software, and predictive analytics as a novel factor in enhancing the effectiveness of wildlife crime investigations.

References

Alketbi Salem K. (2023). The role of DNA in forensic science: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 9(2), 814–829. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2023.9.2.0624

Anagnostou, M. (2021). Synthesizing knowledge on crime convergence and the illegal wildlife trade. Environmental Challenges, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100222

Anagnostou, M., Mwedde, G., Roe, D., Smith, R. J., Travers, H., & Baker, J. (2020). Ranger perceptions of the role of local communities in providing actionable information on wildlife crime. Conservation Science and Practice, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.202

Antony, S. (2018). Mosquito and Tick-borne Illnesses in the United States. Guidelines for the Recognition and Empiric Treatment of Zoonotic Diseases in the Wilderness. Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets, 19(3), 238–257. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871526518666180626123340

Critchlow, R., Plumptre, A. J., Alidria, B., Nsubuga, M., Driciru, M., Rwetsiba, A., Wanyama, F., & Beale, C. M. (2017). Improving Law-Enforcement Effectiveness and Efficiency in Protected Areas Using Ranger-collected Monitoring Data. In Conservation Letters (Vol. 10, Issue 5, pp. 572–580). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12288

Dunlop, S., & Gassman-Pines, J. (2021). Why the Legal Profession is the Nation’s Least Diverse (And How to Fix It). Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 47(1). https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1231&context=mhlr

Federica Panzarella. (2020). The Nexus of Wildlife Trafficking, Development and Security: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Research [THESIS, Tampere University]. https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/123570/PanzarellaFederica.pdf?sequence=2

Gouda, S., Kerry, R. G., Das, A., & Chauhan, N. S. (2020). Wildlife forensics: A boon for species identification and conservation implications. In Forensic Science International (Vol. 317). Elsevier Ireland Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110530

Grojek, A. E., & Sikos, L. F. (2022). Ontology-Driven Artificial Intelligence in IoT Forensics. Breakthroughs in Digital Biometrics and Forensics, 257–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10706-1_12

Hadjigeorgiou, N., & Kapardis, D. (2023). Police Cooperation in Cases of Unrecognised Secessions: The Joint Communications Room in Cyprus. Ethnopolitics, 22(5), 527–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2022.2062861

Haq, R. U., Abdulabad, A., Asghar, S., & Szabo, J. K. (2023). Clicks and comments: Representation of wildlife crime in Pakistan in social media posts. Global Ecology and Conservation, 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02473

Iordăchescu, G., Lappe-Osthege, T., Dickinson, H., Duffy, R., & Burns, C. (2023). Political ecologies of green-collar crime: understanding illegal trades in European wildlife. Environmental Politics, 32(5), 923–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2156173

Krämer, L. (2019). Forty Years of EU Measures to Fight Wildlife Crime. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 22(4), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880292.2019.1701765

Lavorgna, A., & Sajeva, M. (2021). Studying Illegal Online Trades in Plants: Market Characteristics, Organisational and Behavioural Aspects, and Policing Challenges. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 27(4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-020-09447-2

Massé, F., Givá, N., & Lunstrum, E. (2021). A feminist political ecology of wildlife crime: The gendered dimensions of a poaching economy and its impacts in Southern Africa. Geoforum, 126, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.07.031

Mayer, C.-H. (2019). The Context: Wildlife and Wildlife Crime in South Africa from a Green Criminology Perspective. SpringerLink, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05891-3_2

Meeks, W. (2006). Corporate and White-Collar Crime Enforcement: Should Regulation and Rehabilitation Spell an End to Corporate Criminal Liability? Columbia J Law Soc Probl, 40(1), 77. https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A6%3A7545750/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A23606801&crl=c

Oosthuizen, T., Howes, L. M., & White, R. (2023). Forensic DNA analysis and legislative provisions: Balancing rights in a time of scientific advancement. Alternative Law Journal, 48(3), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X231190484

Berk, R. A. (2021). Artificial Intelligence, Predictive Policing, and Risk Assessment for Law Enforcement. Annual Review of Criminology, 4(1), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-051520-012342

Richards, N. L., Hartman, J., Parker, M., Wendt, L., & Salisbury, C. (2021). The Role of Conservation Dog Detection and Ecological Monitoring in Supporting Environmental Forensics and Enforcement Initiatives. Wildlife Biodiversity Conservation: Multidisciplinary and Forensic Approaches, 287–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64682-0_11

Silva-Ramos, C. R., Mejorano-Fonseca, J. A., Rodríguez-Morales, A. J., Hidalgo, M., & Faccini-Martínez, Á. A. (2023). Zoonotic febrile illnesses misdiagnosed as COVID-19: a review of reported clinical cases. In Infezioni in Medicina (Vol. 31, Issue 2, pp. 151–162). EDIMES Edizioni Medico Scientifiche. https://doi.org/10.53854/liim-3102-3

Smith, M. (2018). Universal forensic DNA databases: Balancing the costs and benefits. Alternative Law Journal, 43(2), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X18765222

Thomas, A., Gibson, L., McColl, S., Rae, R., Ogden, R., & Dawnay, N. (2023). What is it vs Who did it? A review of the lack of human focused forensic evidence in the context of wildlife crime. In Forensic Science International: Animals and Environments (Vol. 4). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsiae.2023.100073

Veldhuis, M. S., Ariëns, S., Ypma, R. J. F., Abeel, T., & Benschop, C. C. G. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence in forensics: Realistic explanations for number of contributor predictions of DNA profiles. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102632

Wegner, G. I., Murray, K. A., Springmann, M., Muller, A., Sokolow, S. H., Saylors, K., & Morens, D. M. (2022). Averting wildlife-borne infectious disease epidemics requires a focus on socio-ecological drivers and a redesign of the global food system. EClinicalMedicine, 47, 101386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101386

Williams, C. K. (2019). Criteria and Recommendations for IS Research that Bridges the Academic-Practitioner Gap. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://core.ac.uk/reader/326834710

Wüllenweber, S., & Giles, S. (2021). The effectiveness of forensic evidence in the investigation of volume crime scenes. Science and Justice, 61(5), 542–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2021.06.008

The role of forensic DNA experts and Artificial Intelligence in enhancing the effectiveness of wildlife crime investigations in Cyprus

Authors

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Make a Submission

Information