The effects of artificial light on the behavior of Eastern Mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) in Iran

Authors

  • Hossein Barzegar Faculty of Biological science, Kharazmi university, Tehran, Iran `
  • Sharareh Pourebrahim Jeffrey Sachs Center on Sustainable Development, Sunway University, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
  • Mohammad Ali Zahed Faculty of Biological science, Kharazmi university, Tehran, Iran `
  • Mehrdad Hadipour Faculty of Biological science, Kharazmi university, Tehran, Iran `

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7493138

Keywords:

DMSP, GIS, ALAN, IRAN, Mosquitofish

Abstract

Around 83 percent of the world's population live in light-polluted areas, of which 40 percent live in places that are continuously lit by “ALAN (Artificial Light at Night)”. The light pollution caused by “ALAN” is growing day by day.  Thus, the risk of environmental damage is growing in aquatic areas by increasing the “ALAN”. In this way, this research investigates the artificial light at night’s a “ALAN” effect on Gambusia Holbrooke “mosquitofish” in Iran. To obtain the ALAN data, we relied on the information from the operational linear satellite scanning data related to the Metrological Defense Satellite Program (DMSP/OLS). the data provided by the DMSP satellite belonged to 1992 and 2013 as images. The images were clipped by the geographical information systems (GIS), and the images were classified into five classes based on the light pollution intensity. Afterwards, the changes in light pollution by area were calculated and reported. The aim of this research was to examine the effect of ALAN on the Gambusia holbrooki. Two types of treatments were provided for G. holbrooki: control and ALAN treatments. In both treatments, fish were kept for 60 days, and after that period, their shoaling and hiding behaviors were examined and recorded by a web camera. The results indicated that by increasing the ALAN, especially near the coastlines, the risk of harmful effects on G. holbrooki could be increased. The findings suggested that the ALAN might influence G. holbrooki behavior. The shoaling behavior of the ALAN treatments samples revealed that the time spent shoaling individually at night and during the day was decreased. As a result, in the hiding behavior experiment, G. holbrooki moved less at night after ALAN exposure but did not hide, indicating that the fish are unlikely to swim away or hide when exposed to light at night. As a result, they may be more vulnerable to predation.

References

Pyke, G. H. (2008). Plague minnow or mosquito fish? A review of the biology and impacts of introduced Gambusia species. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 171-191.

Batra, T., Malik, I., & Kumar, V. (2019). Illuminated night alters behaviour and negatively affects physiology and metabolism in diurnal zebra finches. Environmental Pollution, 254, 112916.

Belk, M. C., & Lydeard, C. (1994). Effect of Gambusia holbrooki on a similar-sized, syntopic poeciliid, Heterandria formosa: competitor or predator? Copeia, 296-302.

Bradshaw, W. E., & Holzapfel, C. M. (2010). Light, time, and the physiology of biotic response to rapid climate change in animals. Annual review of physiology, 72, 147-166.

Brahmandzadeh, D., & Rezaei Ghahroudy, Z. (2014). Investigation of the trend of electricity changes in different sectors. Statistics, 6, 33-29.

Cinzano, P., Falchi, F., Elvidge, C. D., & Baugh, K. E. (2000). The artificial night sky brightness mapped from DMSP satellite Operational Linescan System measurements. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 318(3), 641-657.

Dananay, K. L., & Benard, M. F. (2018). Artificial light at night decreases metamorphic duration and juvenile growth in a widespread amphibian. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1882), 20180367.

Elvidge, C., Baugh, K., Hobson, V., Kihn, E., Kroehl, H., Davis, E., & Cocero, D. (1997). Satellite inventory of human settlements using nocturnal radiation emissions: a contribution for the global toolchest. Global Change Biology, 3(5), 387-395.

Dobson, J. E., Bright, E. A., Coleman, P. R., Durfee, R. C., & Worley, B. A. (2000). LandScan: a global population database for estimating populations at risk. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing, 66(7), 849-857.

Downing, G., & Litvak, M. K. (2002). Effects of light intensity, spectral composition and photoperiod on development and hatching of haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) embryos. Aquaculture, 213(1-4), 265-278.

Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., Kawabata, Z. I., Knowler, D. J., Lévêque, C., ... & Sullivan, C. A. (2006). Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological reviews, 81(2), 163-182.

Ellis, E. C. (2011). Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938), 1010-1035.

Falchi, F., Cinzano, P., Duriscoe, D., Kyba, C. C., Elvidge, C. D., Baugh, K., ... & Furgoni, R. (2016). The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness. Science advances, 2(6), e1600377.

Foster, J. G., Algera, D. A., Brownscombe, J. W., Zolderdo, A. J., & Cooke, S. J. (2016). Consequences of different types of littoral zone light pollution on the parental care behaviour of a freshwater teleost fish. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 227(11), 1-9.

Gaston, K. J., Bennie, J., Davies, T. W., & Hopkins, J. (2013). The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal. Biological reviews, 88(4), 912-927.

Gaston, K. J., Visser, M. E., & Hölker, F. (2015). The biological impacts of artificial light at night: the research challenge. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1667), 20140133.

Gaston, K. J., & Bennie, J. (2014). Demographic effects of artificial nighttime lighting on animal populations. Environmental Reviews, 22(4), 323-330.

He, C., Ma, Q., Liu, Z., & Zhang, Q. (2014). Modeling the spatiotemporal dynamics of electric power consumption in Mainland China using saturation-corrected DMSP/OLS nighttime stable light data. International Journal of Digital Earth, 7(12), 993-1014.

Kurvers, R. H., Drägestein, J., Hölker, F., Jechow, A., Krause, J., & Bierbach, D. (2018). Artificial light at night affects emergence from a refuge and space use in guppies. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1-10.

Laland, K. N., & Williams, K. (1997). Shoaling generates social learning of foraging information in guppies. Animal Behaviour, 53(6), 1161-1169.

Lo, C. P. (2002). Urban indicators of China from radiance‐calibrated digital DMSP‐OLS nighttime images. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(2), 225-240.

Miner, K. A., Huertas, M., Aspbury, A. S., & Gabor, C. R. (2021). Artificial Light at Night Alters the Physiology and Behavior of Western Mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 617063.

O'Connor, J. J., Fobert, E. K., Besson, M., Jacob, H., & Lecchini, D. (2019). Live fast, die young: Behavioural and physiological impacts of light pollution on a marine fish during larval recruitment. Marine pollution bulletin, 146, 908-914.

Sutton, P., Roberts, D., Elvidge, C., & Meij, H. (1997). A Comparison of Nighttime Satellite Imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 63(11), 1303-1313.

Pitcher, T. J. (1986). Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In The behaviour of teleost fishes (pp. 294-337). Springer, Boston, MA.

Pun, C. S. J., & So, C. W. (2012). Night-sky brightness monitoring in Hong Kong. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 184(4), 2537-2557.

Pyke, G. H. (2005). A review of the biology of Gambusia affinis and G. holbrooki. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 15(4), 339-365.

Raap, T., Pinxten, R., & Eens, M. (2015). Light pollution disrupts sleep in free-living animals. Scientific reports, 5(1), 1-8.

Salehipour, A. M. (2020). “Monitoring Artificial Light Pollution in Iran.” Sustainable Earth Review 1(3): 33–46.

Sutton, P. C., & Costanza, R. (2002). Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 509-527.

Swaddle, J. P., Francis, C. D., Barber, J. R., Cooper, C. B., Kyba, C. C., Dominoni, D. M., ... & Longcore, T. (2015). A framework to assess evolutionary responses to anthropogenic light and sound. Trends in ecology & evolution, 30(9), 550-560.

Tobler, M., & Schlupp, I. (2008). Influence of black spot disease on shoaling behaviour in female western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis (Poeciliidae, Teleostei). Environmental Biology of Fishes, 81(1), 29-34. Keivany, Y., Nasri, M., Abbasi, K., & Abdoli, A. Fishes of Iran.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Barzegar, H., Pourebrahim, S. ., Zahed , M. A. ., & Hadipour, M. (2022). The effects of artificial light on the behavior of Eastern Mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) in Iran. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity, 8(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7493138