Forthcoming

Predicting slow driving intentions to mitigate wildlife-vehicle collisions in Malaysia

Authors

  • Zulkhairi Azizi Zainal Abidin Department of Recreation and Ecotourism, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9623-7082
  • Noor Jalilah Jumaat Department of Recreation and Ecotourism, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7603-8887
  • Evelyn Lim Ai Lin Department of Recreation and Ecotourism, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3516-3200
  • Muhammad Faiz Md. Noh Department of Recreation and Ecotourism, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Alif Asmawi Department of Recreation and Ecotourism, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Malaysia
  • Abdullah Zawawi Yazid Department of Recreation and Ecotourism, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Malaysia

Keywords:

sustainability, wildlife conservation, wildlife roadkill, road safety

Abstract

Research to understand wildlife-vehicle collisions has predominantly focused on spatial patterns and wildlife behaviors. Yet, as collisions also involve drivers, the human factors are important too and very few studies focus on the human dimension aspects of wildlife roadkill. Based on the theory of planned behavior, the present study examined the influence of driving attitude, driving norm, and perceived driving control on driving intentions to drive slowly, in three scenarios involving possible wildlife-vehicle collisions. An online survey was conveniently distributed to a sample of drivers in Malaysia to collect data (n = 270). The study found driving attitude as the most important factor influencing driving intentions, followed by driving norm and perceived driving control, based on the significant results and β values. Across scenario, driving norm influenced driving intention to drive slowly. The present study also found that the influence on driving intention is unique depending on the situation. Specifically, the three psychological factors were more influential in scenario encountering familiar stimulus (warning signage and common wildlife) than the more non-familiar trigger (uncommon wildlife species). Practically, the study offers insight on how to mitigate wildlife-vehicle collisions, focusing on the use of technology and artificial intelligence, including improving education that addresses driving attitude, driving norm, and perceived driving control.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behavior (2nd ed.). Open University Press.

Ajzen, I. (2019). Sample TPB questionnaire. University of Massachusetts Amherst, 1–9. http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.questionnaire.pdf

Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195

Amit, R., & Jacobson, S.K. (2017). Understanding rancher coexistence with jaguars and pumas: A typology for conservation practice. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(6), 1353–1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1304-1

Ayob, N., Mustapha, M.A., Senawi, J., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Drivers’ perception and attitude towards wildlife-vehicle collisions in Langkawi Island, Kedah, Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal, 75(2), 341–351.

Azhar, B., Lindenmayer, D., Wood, J., Fischer, J., Manning, A., McElhinny, C., & Zakaria, M. (2013). Contribution of illegal hunting, culling of pest species, road accidents and feral dogs to biodiversity loss in established oil-palm landscapes. Wildlife Research, 40(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR12036

Bennett, N.J., Roth, R., Klain, S.C., Chan, K.M.A., Clark, D.A., Cullman, G., Epstein, G., Nelson, M.P., Stedman, R., Teel, T.L., Thomas, R.E.W., Wyborn, C., Curran, D., Greenberg, A., Sandlos, J., & Veríssimo, D. (2017). Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation. Conservation Biology, 31(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12788

Borza, S., Godó, L., Valkó, O., Végvári, Z., & Deák, B. (2023). Better safe than sorry – Understanding the attitude and habits of drivers can help mitigating animal-vehicle collisions. Journal of Environmental Management, 339(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117917

Bosnjak, M., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 352–356.

Chen, X., & Wu, S. (2014). Examining patterns of animal-vehicle collisions in Alabama, USA. Human-Wildlife Interactions, 8(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.26077/p18k-1089

Collinson, W.J., Marneweck, C., & Davies-Mostert, H.T. (2019). Protecting the protected: Reducing wildlife roadkill in protected areas. Animal Conservation, 22(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12481

Corlett, R. T. (2007). The impact of hunting on the mammalian fauna of tropical Asian forests. Biotropica, 39(3), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744- 7429.2007.00271.x

Crawford, B.A., & Andrews, K.M. (2016). Drivers’ attitudes toward wildlife-vehicle collisions with reptiles and other taxa. Animal Conservation, 19(5), 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12261

Crawford, B.A., Poudyal, N.C., & Maerz, J.C. (2015). When drivers and terrapins collide: Assessing stakeholder attitudes toward wildlife management on the Jekyll Island Causeway. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2014.948103

D’Amico, M., Román, J., de los Reyes, L., & Revilla, E. (2015). Vertebrate road-kill patterns in Mediterranean habitats: Who, when and where. Biological Conservation, 191, 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.010

Gallagher, D., Ting, L., & Palmer, A. (2008). A journey into the unknown; taking the fear out of structural equation modeling with AMOS for the first-time user. The Marketing Review, 8(3), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934708X337672

Hai, D.N., Minh, C.C., & Huynh, N. (2024). Meta-analysis of driving behavior studies and assessment of factors using structural equation modeling. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 14, 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2023.05.002

Hansen, M.F., Ang, A., Trinh, T., Sy, E., Paramasiwam, S., Ahmed, T., Dimalibot, J., Jones-Engel, L., Ruppert, N., Griffioen, C., Lwin, N., Phiapalath, P., Gray, R., Kite, S., Doak, N., Nijman, V., Fuentes, A., & Gumert, M.D. (2022). Macaca fascicularis, Long-tailed Macaque. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2022-1.RLTS.T12551A199563077.en

Hrubes, D., Ajzen, I., & Daigle, J. (2001). Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 23(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/014904001316896855

Ismail, N.M.A., Baharom, M.Z., Manap, Z.A., Hassan, M.H.A., Karjanto, J., & Jawi, Z.M. (2024). Malaysian driver’s response during obstacle avoidance task using driving simulation study: A preliminary study. Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers Malaysia, 1–16.

Jacobs, M.H., Vaske, J.J., Teel, T.L., & Manfredo, M.J. (2018). Human dimensions of wildlife. In L. Steg, A.E. van den Berg, & J.I.M. de Groot (Eds.), Environmental psychology: An introduction (2nd ed.). BPS Blackwell.

Krauss, J.E. (2022). Unpacking SDG 15, its targets and indicators: Tracing ideas of conservation. Globalizations, 19(8), 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2035480

Langley, R.L., Higgins, S.A., & Herrin, K.B. (2006). Risk factors associated with fatal animal-vehicle collisions in the United States, 1995-2004. Wilderness and Environmental Medicine, 17(4), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1580/06-WEME-OR-001R1.1

Lester, D. (2015). Effective wildlife roadkill mitigation. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 3(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2142/2015.01.005

Liordos, V., Kontsiotis, V.J., Georgari, M., Baltzi, K., & Baltzi, I. (2017). Public acceptance of management methods under different human–wildlife conflict scenarios. Science of the Total Environment, 579, 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.040

Mallia, L., Lazuras, L., Violani, C., & Lucidi, F. (2015). Crash risk and aberrant driving behaviors among bus drivers: The role of personality and attitudes towards traffic safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 79, 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.034

Manfredo, M.J. (2008). Who cares about wildlife? Social science concepts for exploring human-wildlife relationships and conservation issues. Springer.

Miller, Z.D. (2017). The enduring use of the theory of planned behavior. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22(6), 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2017.1347967

Miyashita, Y. (2004). Cognitive memory: Cellular and network machineries and their top-down control. Science, 306, 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1101864

Mohd Suri, M.S., Magintan, D., Yawah, D., Ismail, M.N., Lim, E.L.A., Mohd Sanusi, M., & Ismail, R. (2022). Conservation of Malayan Tapir (Tapirus indicus) (E.L.A., Lim, C.L., Puan, M.W., Hiew, M., Mohd Sanusi, D., Magintan, & D. Yawah (eds.)). National Library of Malaysia.

Nunally, J. (1967). Psychometric methods. McGraw-Hill.

Pagany, R. (2020). Wildlife-vehicle collisions - Influencing factors, data collection and research methods. Biological Conservation, 251, 108758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108758

Pang, B., Zhang, A., Seydel, T., David, P., Yousef, M., & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2023). Reducing koala roadkill: A social marketing formative study. Wildlife Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/wr21172

Perak Academy. (2015). The big five. http://perakacademy.com/

Peterson, R.A. (2013). Meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr476

Ramp, D., Wilson, V.K., & Croft, D.B. (2016). Contradiction and complacency shape attitudes towards the toll of roads on wildlife. Animals, 6(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6060040

Secco, H., Ratton, P., Castro, E., da Silva Lucas, P., & Bager, A. (2014). Intentional snake road-kill: A case study using fake snakes on a Brazilian road. Tropical Conservation Science, 7(3), 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291400700313

Sheena, B., Mariapan, M., & Aziz, A. (2014). Characteristics of Malaysian ecotourist segments in Kinabalu Park, Sabah. Tourism Geographies, 17(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2013.865069

Shen, B., Ge, Y., Qu, W., Sun, X., & Zhang, K. (2018). The different effects of personality on prosocial and aggressive driving behavior in a Chinese sample. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 56, 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.04.019

Siriwat, P., & Nijman, V. (2020). Wildlife trade shifts from brick-and-mortar markets to virtual marketplaces: A case study of birds of prey trade in Thailand. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 13(3), 454–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2020.03.012

Somoray, K., White, K.M., Watson, B., & Lewis, I. (2024). Predicting risky driving behaviors using the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 208, 107797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107797

Traeholt, C., Novarino, W., Saaban, S., Shwe, N.M., Lynam, A., Zainuddin, Z., Simpson, B., & Mohd, S. (2016). Tapirus indicus, Malay Tapir. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T21472A45173636.en

Ulleberg, P., & Rundmo, T. (2003). Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behavior among young drivers. Safety Science, 41(5), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00077-7

Vanlaar, W.G.M., Barrett, H., Hing, M.M., Brown, S.W., & Robertson, R.D. (2019). Canadian wildlife-vehicle collisions: An examination of knowledge and behavior for collision prevention. Journal of Safety Research, 68, 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2018.12.003

Vaske, J. J. (2008). Survey research and analysis: Applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. Venture Publishing.

Zainal Abidin, Z.A. (2019). Understanding human responses to wildlife in Malaysia. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18174/494705

Downloads

Published

2025-11-04

How to Cite

Zainal Abidin, Z. A., Jumaat, N. J., Lin, E. L. A., Md. Noh, M. F., Asmawi, M. A., & Yazid, A. Z. . (2025). Predicting slow driving intentions to mitigate wildlife-vehicle collisions in Malaysia. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity, 9(X), 1–18. Retrieved from https://wildlife-biodiversity.com/index.php/jwb/article/view/1008

Issue

Section

Original Article